Class Action Administration Insurance Class Action Experience
 
 

INSURANCE


Insurance class action settlements often involve analysis of policyholder data.  CAA's data analysis experience allows us to quickly analyze data from a variety of sources, and synthesize it into a coherent picture.  When the data is incomplete, CAA has the expertise to conduct the needed research.

Below are examples of Class Action Administration's extensive experience in this challenging field.

Unless otherwise noted, these cases settled prior to trial.  The parties cooperated to achieve a mutually agreeable outcome.  The fact that a settlement was reached should not be construed as an admission of wrongdoing on the part of the defendants.

Belscher v. Kemper

The class was composed of 600 Colorado consumers whose vehicle had been in an accident.  Plaintiffs alleged that their insurance benefits did not properly account for the lost value of their vehicle.  CAA provided the following services:

  • Provided Pre-Settlement Consulting to design the claims process
  • Designed notice and claim form
  • Printed & mailed notice and claim form
  • Processed claim forms and opt-outs
  • Answered class member inquiries
  • Research automobile values for use in calculating benefits
  • Calculated benefits
  • Disbursed benefits
  • Enfield v. Old Line Life Insurance

    The nationwide class of 450,000 life insurance policyholders alleged that the Defendant failed to properly disclose its practice of charging extra to those who made non-annual (modal) premium payments.  CAA provided the following services:

  • Identified sources of data for analysis
  • Developed software to analyze class member data
  • Created damages modeling software to determine premiums collected
  • Drafted expert report on damages
  • Provided Pre-Settlement Consulting
  • Provided expert deposition testimony
  • Hicks v. American Family Insurance

    The class was composed of 17,000 automobile insurance policyholders whose coverage was to be reformed to a higher level of coverage.  CAA provided the following services:

  • Designed notice
  • Printed & mailed notice
  • Answered class member inquiries
  • Performed research to locate class members
  • Quinn v. American Family Insurance

    The class was comprised of 231,000 Colorado auto insurance policyholders who paid premiums for uninsured-motorist coverage on more than one vehicle.  Plaintiffs alleged that such coverage is only required on one vehicle.  CAA provided the following services:

  • Designed notice
  • Printed & mailed notice
  • Processed opt-outs
  • Answered class member inquiries
  • Performed additional research to locate class members
  • Calculated benefits
  • Disbursed benefits
  • Managed settlement fund
  • Jahnke v. Shelter Mutual Insurance

    The class was comprised of 15,000 Colorado auto insurance policyholders who paid premiums for uninsured-motorist coverage on more than one vehicle.  Plaintiffs alleged that such coverage is only required on one vehicle.  CAA provided the following services:

  • Designed notice
  • Printed & mailed notice
  • Processed opt-outs
  • Answered class member inquiries
  • Performed additional research to locate class members
  • Calculated benefits
  • Disbursed benefits
  • Managed settlement fund
  • Fike v. Auto-Owners Insurance

    The class was comprised of 7,300 Colorado auto insurance policyholders who paid premiums for uninsured-motorist coverage on more than one vehicle.  Plaintiffs alleged that such coverage is only required on one vehicle.  CAA provided the following services:

  • Designed notice
  • Printed & mailed notice
  • Processed opt-outs
  • Answered class member inquiries
  • Performed additional research to locate class members
  • Calculated benefits
  • Disbursed benefits
  • Managed settlement fund
  • Fike v. Unitrin

    The class was comprised of 2,600 Colorado auto insurance policyholders who paid premiums for uninsured-motorist coverage on more than one vehicle.  Plaintiffs alleged that such coverage is only required on one vehicle.  CAA provided the following services:

  • Designed notice
  • Printed & mailed notice
  • Processed opt-outs
  • Answered class member inquiries
  • Performed additional research to locate class members
  • Calculated benefits
  • Disbursed benefits
  • Managed settlement fund
  • Lewis v. Merastar

    The class was comprised of 1,700 Colorado auto insurance policyholders who paid premiums for uninsured-motorist coverage on more than one vehicle.  Plaintiffs alleged that such coverage is only required on one vehicle.  CAA provided the following services:

  • Designed notice
  • Printed & mailed notice
  • Processed opt-outs
  • Answered class member inquiries
  • Performed additional research to locate class members
  • Calculated benefits
  • Disbursed benefits
  • Managed settlement fund
  • Fike v. Union

    The class was comprised of 5,900 Colorado auto insurance policyholders who paid premiums for uninsured-motorist coverage on more than one vehicle.  Plaintiffs alleged that such coverage is only required on one vehicle.  CAA provided the following services:

  • Designed notice
  • Printed & mailed notice
  • Processed opt-outs
  • Answered class member inquiries
  • Performed additional research to locate class members
  • Calculated benefits
  • Disbursed benefits
  • Managed settlement fund

  • Contact us to learn more about how CAA can assist you with your next class action settlement.